Analysis of New York Restaurant Inspections
Projects | | Links:

Note: The code and the result cannot be publicly displayed due to copywriting by The Data Incubator; however, they can be sent privately upon request.
Project Overview:
Objective:
Building upon the earlier analyses, this segment of the project ventures deeper into the intricate details of restaurant inspections in New York City, mainly focusing on violations concerning different cuisines.
Key Insights and Learning Points:
Introduction:
Every restaurant in New York City undergoes regular inspections, and a score is assigned based on its adherence to health regulations. This comprehensive data provides unique insights that can greatly influence stakeholders ranging from consumers to restaurant owners and policymakers.
Violations by Cuisine:
When assessing violations, it's pivotal to normalize the data, given the varying inspection histories of restaurants. A method employed was to use the length of time a restaurant has been operational, offering a sense of how the number of violations relates to its tenure. The crux was to compute the weighted average of violations: Total violations for a particular cuisine divided by the total number of years restaurants of that cuisine have been operational. Learning Point: Normalization is a vital step to ensure data comparability. Different ways of normalization can influence the resulting insights, urging careful consideration in the method choice. Specific Violations by Cuisine:
This section delved into understanding the specifics of violations associated with different cuisines. It's essential to note that popular cuisines might naturally report more violations due to their sheer volume. The conditional probability of a violation given a cuisine type was calculated and then normalized by the overall probability of that violation.
Learning Point: Understanding disproportionality is key.
It's essential to identify if certain violations are genuinely specific to certain cuisines or are just commonly occurring.
Technical Implementation and SQL Proficiency:
SQL's capabilities were fully displayed, from creating and manipulating temporary tables to leveraging advanced functions like CASE statements, JOIN operations, and window functions.
Learning Point:
Advanced SQL functionalities like window functions provide powerful tools for data analysis. Understanding when and how to use them can significantly improve data processing efficiency and insight quality.
Data Management and Integrity:
A significant challenge in the data was handling null values, particularly ensuring that the analysis was based on complete and meaningful data.
Learning Point:
Ensuring data integrity is paramount. Only complete or accurately represented data can lead to accurate results.
Conclusions and Implications:
By delving deep into the inspection data, this project unraveled critical insights regarding restaurant violations concerning different cuisines. Such findings have profound implications:
For Consumers:
It explains which cuisines have more violations, enabling informed dining decisions.
For Restaurant Owners:
They can understand common pitfalls in their cuisine category and proactively work towards avoiding such violations.
For Policymakers:
Targeted interventions can be devised for cuisines with a higher propensity for certain violations.
The project underscores the value of systematic data analysis, revealing patterns and insights that might otherwise remain hidden. As we move forward, there's potential to further refine this analysis by looking into other factors like restaurant size, location specifics, or even inspection times, offering a more holistic understanding of the inspection landscape in New York City.